Federal mass tort intelligence

Follow the cases.Understand the numbers.

Court-sourced case counts, clearly labeled settlement status, and plain-English context—without the payout hype.

Original sourcesEvery figure datedCorrections published
01

Numbers with provenanceEvery count links back to a dated source.

02

Estimates labeled honestlyProjections never masquerade as confirmed payouts.

03

Changes that mean somethingWe explain what moved, not just that it moved.

Largest active dockets

The cases shaping the federal mass tort landscape

Ranked by actions currently pending in the JPML's August 3, 2026 report. Federal totals do not include every state-court or unfiled claim.

#1 by pending actionsMDL 2738

Talcum Powder

Federal claims alleging that talc products caused ovarian cancer or mesothelioma are coordinated in New Jersey.

Pending
68,914
Federal district
District of New Jersey
View case tracker
#2 by pending actionsMDL 2846

Bard Hernia Mesh

Federal cases involving certain Bard and Davol polypropylene hernia mesh products are coordinated in Ohio.

Pending
23,321
Federal district
Southern of Ohio
View case tracker
#3 by pending actionsMDL 2873

AFFF Firefighting Foam

The AFFF docket coordinates federal claims involving alleged exposure to PFAS-containing firefighting foam.

Pending
15,246
Federal district
District of South Carolina
View case tracker
#4 by pending actionsMDL 3060

Hair Relaxer

Federal lawsuits concerning certain hair relaxer products and alleged cancer risks are coordinated in Illinois.

Pending
11,779
Federal district
Northern of Illinois
View case tracker
#5 by pending actionsMDL 2789

Proton-Pump Inhibitors

The federal PPI docket coordinates claims involving certain heartburn medicines and alleged kidney injuries.

Pending
11,321
Federal district
District of New Jersey
View case tracker
#6 by pending actionsMDL 2666

Bair Hugger

Federal claims involving Bair Hugger surgical warming devices and alleged infection risks are coordinated in Minnesota.

Pending
8,407
Federal district
District of Minnesota
View case tracker

Why Settlement Advocate

Most settlement pages start with a number. We start with the record.

Search results are crowded with unsupported payout ranges, recycled filing totals, and “latest” updates with no date. That makes it hard to tell what a court actually did from what someone expects it to do.

We separate verified events, reported allegations, and analysis. If an official settlement program does not exist, we say so plainly.

Read our editorial standards

Research desk

Go beyond the headline

Focused reports on court timelines, case-count movement, scientific evidence, labels, and what settlement documents actually establish.

Settlement literacy

Read the docket like an insider

Short, practical guides for understanding what legal headlines leave out.

Primary source desk

One official report. Hundreds of claims. Zero room for fuzzy numbers.

Our launch dataset is reconciled against the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's monthly report. Each tracker carries the source date, docket number, district, judge, and scope note.

Open the August federal report